7/23/2023 0 Comments Star trek online reviewsThe plot just kept jumping around pretty aimlessly, without any sense of natural flow or progression. ![]() Both the visual design and retconning of their history. The crew tended to be over-emotional and impulsive, which felt at odds with the characters and tone from previous series in the franchise.Ĥ. It bothered me that they doubled down on the time travel/mirror universe shenanigans, which add complexity to the franchise, but not depth.ģ. My main problem was with the central premise and the visual look of the show.ġ, The spore drive just felt out of place in the Star Trek franchise.Ģ. Unlike others, I didn't have any particular beef with the central character - Michael Burnham - or the actress that played her. ![]() Roddenberry must be rolling over in his grave (ok, I know he was cremated).Īs someone who has watched every Star Trek episode starting in the 60's, I just don't see how the writers / directors came up with this and can call it Star Trek. Further, and I don't know why this is so, but the level of the sounds of explosions, shaking, banging, etc drowned out any conversation (sometimes that was fortunate, as so much of the conversation was inane), but making a lot of loud noises doesn't make it a space science fiction story. The technology shown was way ahead of its time, apparently to make up for the lousy script, nonsensical actions by the crew, and a weak story line. The story line was unbelievable, as if it was some alternate story of the Star Trek universe. All the staring into the camera, the weepy eyes constantly, the miserably ridiculous lines, the endless worthless conversations, even in the event of danger, all made for episodes that lacked any of the uniqueness of any of the Star Trek series. The acting is way overdone, especially by Martin-Green. ![]() Season 1 of Star Trek Discovery was painful to watch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |